New brands and networks of solicitors

There is a new trend that Law firms have begun in England and Wales where these firms are trying to form a Supermarket network where these firms are taking on malls and even banks and such establishments on the High Street. Quality Solicitors is the brand that has been developed in an effort for all these Law firms that have signed up to re-launch themselves. There have already been about two hundred law firms that have signed up with this brand to form this kind of a network all around England and Wales. What they intend to do is offer absolutely no-strings-attached and minus all the frills of legal advice for their clients as far as family law and even consumer and contract legal disputes are concerned.
There are already fifteen branches of this brand that have been created and set up and there will be more than thirty of the same that are going to be set up in a few more months, by August they plan on being completely settled down. This is an attempt that is being made by the brand to compete and get a head start against the other Halifax as well as co-op Supermarket chain that are very soon going to set off and take launch in the legal market very soon.
This Co-op that is going to begin soon has already started hiring solicitors and they have already expected to earn around two hundred million pounds within a few years at least, all this one of the first real results of the Legal Service Act that was passed in 2007.
The basic aim of all these network of solicitors is to create on a national basis a network of legal help that can become a household name for basic legal advice and help so that one doesn’t have to research through hundreds of legal firms to find a reliable one.

The FSA charges the largest fine

There have been reasons which are being considered why this recent decision that the FSA has taken against a former stockbroker. They FSA (Financial Services Authority) have declared that they are fining this former stockbroker (Simon Eagle) an amount of 2.8 million pounds for his crime- market abuse. However, the accused has claimed that this kind of a fine is absolutely “absurd” in his words and he believes that the reason why the FSA has taken this decision is only because they are trying to prove how tough they can be in this economic condition.
Mr. Eagle was accused by the Authority that he was the main guy who planned and schemed a plan in which the share prices of a computer components company- Fundamental E Investments, and this scheme was supposed to have been a very complicated and well planned scheme which he might have become successful at.
This fine that the FSA has charged against the individual is supposed to have been the biggest fine ever that the authority has charged against anybody and they have declared that the man is a “dishonest cheat” in the words of the Head of the Organization Margaret Cole and they have also declared that he should be banned from all kinds of financial services.
However, even though the fine has already been charged Mr. Eagle has  also declared that this kind of price ramping of the shares never ever took place and that if he had the means to afford to challenge the case against him, he would have. So the fine that has been charged against him is also not going to be affordable for him and he claims that the Organization knows this fully well too, he was supposed to have gone bankrupt in 2005 and had lost all his assets then.

Property fraud related to Yorkshire tycoon comes to a close

It has recently been found out that a Yorkshire tycoon who had been charged for fraud and that too multimillion pounds in amount has actually been acquitted, this after having been charged of this fraud for the past three years.
The man in question is Simon Morris, he used to be the director of the Leeds United Football Club and was in fact one of the richest young men in the UK whose fortunes spanned to over seventy million pounds, however his empire failed in 2008 and that is when he was charged of this fraud as well. The fraud was caught by the West Yorkshire Police with the help of the Serious Fraud Office after he was being accused with allegations of fraud related to property as well as mortgage payments. However the SFO (Serious Fraud Office) has very recently declared that they had to drop their charges against him because of the lack of evidence and so could not hold any criminal case against Mr. Morris any longer.
Mr. Morris is one of the youngest entrepreneurs in Britain to amass as much wealth and property as he has, which is over hundreds of properties and all this within the age of thirty three, which he is now. However, his company collapsed in 2008 because of the huge amount of debt he ended up incurring, which was around fifty million pounds approximately. He also became the youngest director of the Leeds United Football Club in 2004, however he lost out soon to Ken Bates who was its chairman in the middle of all the power struggle.
Morris has stated that though he feels relief with the statement of his release from investigation, he is not exactly celebrating because of all the devastation that the investigation has caused in his professional and personal life.

Coroner’s news regarding the July 7th Bombings

The latest news from the coroner’s office relating to the bombings of July 7 is that the matter of the M15 will be dealt with at the same time when the inquisition of the fifty two peoples death is held. Lady Justice Hallit believes that two are not exactly unrelated and the investigation into the two can take place at the same time without causing harm to the investigation either of the two incidents.  She also believes strongly that this kind of a plot has obviously not just developed overnight and so can be investigated together.
So what the inquests will basically deal with is the failing of the intelligence that might have caused the success of the bombings and of course the aftermath of this bombing as well. The lady Justice has also claimed that the cases, the inquests of the four suicide bombers will be heard in front of her and also without a jury. It was a sixty two page long ruling that she made where she described the miserable state of situation caused by the bombings of the suicide bombers, not to forget the fifty two people who were killed in the incident as well as the plight of those who were injured by the same.
Within the same ruling she also mentioned that she has taken the decision of including the inquisition of the failing of the intelligence while keeping in mind what the families of those dead and injured might be wanting, which is a decision that they would readily welcome to see that everybody is being so well scrutinized. She believes that this was a crucial decision because the families of the victims should know whether more could have been done to prevent the accident or not and whose fault it is exactly.

Law firms reduce on commission for recruiters

Even though the news in the industry is that law firms are not exactly enthusiastic about hiring new associates, some firms might actually disagree with this, because hiring non partners is probably going to be on the rise again. This is at least what many firms around the USA are confirming as well as recruiters. However, the only thing that might end up causing problems for this kind of uptake in the industry is that many firms are protesting against the commission that all recruiters consider as standard when they place associates in these law firms.
The usual commission that these recruiters ask for is a 25% to 30% fee from the first month’s salary of the associate that they are placing, at least in the major legal markets. These law firms have already proclaimed that they will be reducing the commission fees to not more than 12%. However, although there have already been many recruitment firms that have faced such cut backs they still claim that these are only temporary and will soon increase. These recruitment agencies believe that this kind of a dismal condition is basically because of the slack in the economy and will change very soon when the economy is fair again and the law forms start competing again against each other for good quality associates.
There is of course also the claim from many recruitment agencies that this kind of reduction in the commission is not exactly a tidal change and most of them are claiming that they have not even been asked to reduce their commission by the firms they are placing associates in. So, while some recruiting agencies claim that this lowering of rates by the law firms is only a short term arrangement many are also claiming that this is basically nonexistent.

Low-slung trousers face criticism

Trousers are now being closely watched. So if you are wearing those low-slung, baggy trousers that reveal your backside (which are quite the fashion with teenagers), you need to be a little cautious. Last Wednesday, prosecutors who were asked to force Ellis Drummond (from Rushden, Northamptonshire) to pull up his trousers in public, refused to do so. Drummond had been convicted of assault, and was charged with antisocial behavior that included a ban on wearing low trousers which showed off his underwear to the public at large. However, after complaints this charge was withdrawn, because District Judge Nicholas Leigh-Smith stated that some of the requirements of the charge seemed to him to contradict the Human Rights Act.
Drummond walked out of court, with low-slung tracksuit bottoms, falling halfway to his thighs, and most of his boxer shorts visible. However, people of this age group generally feel that no one should be able to dictate what a person should and should not be allowed to wear, unless the person in question was showing skin. One 18 year old boy said that personally, he didn’t like seeing old men whose shirt buttons were undone, with their hairy chests showing – that, to him, was possibly worse than seeing someone’s boxers.
This low-trouser look takes its inspiration from the US, probably from prison trousers which sag because they are so oversized and do not have belts. What’s more, certain hip-hop artists have popularized this look.
Delcambre, in Louisiana, made the wearing of such low-slung trousers illegal, in 2007. The look has also faced criticism from President Obama, and a “Stop the Sag” billboard campaign is on in New York, which encourages youngsters to raise their pants, and hence raise their images. Legislations have also been undertaken by many schools in Europe against this trend. However, youngsters generally agree that this low-rise look doesn’t suit everyone.

What’s the matter with our magistrates?

A recent study shows that at least 55 percent of criminal offences are dealt with outside the courts of justice. The study also shows that on-the-spot fines exceed the amount of 200,000 pounds a year, and that at least one fifth of offenders who breach the conditional cautions are not pursued by the Crown Prosecution Service. A select committee of the Commons showed this as a change in the concept of a criminal justice system.
Such a change, say experts, is dangerous not just for the concept and idea of justice itself, but also for the magistrates’ courts’ summary jurisdictions. Thus one must take a step back, review to problem, and arrest the cause of damage.
A nation is defined by many things. Among these things, it is defines by how it responds to lawlessness. Today, the levels of crime, antisocial behavior, and prison numbers is on the ride – thus the Government seems to have resorted to out-of-court measures, and other desperate measures, in an effort to maintain laws. But this also means that traditional procedures are being done away with, that resource-driven policies are placing the system more importantly than the fair practice needs. So crime figures are made to look more appealing, and the performance targets seem much easier to meet!
However, now, for even serious offences like violence, repeated cautions are being given- sometimes the offenders do not even face charges! The police are supported by a third tier of assorted officials to make use of their powers, and they give out instant justice of their own, on a take it or leave it basis. There is no transparency, no compensation – indeed, gone are the days of consistency, argument and mitigation, not to mention the procedure of testing.

Height will be honored by Obama as godmother of civil rights

On Thursday, US President Barack Obama will be delivering the eulogy for the late Dorothy I. Height, whom he refers to as the godmother of the civil rights movement. Height had led the National Council for Negro Woman for many decades, and had marched with the Reverend Martin Luther King Jr.  – She would be honored at Washington National Cathedral with a funeral service, for her tremendous leadership and dedication to the fight for equality, education and the removal of racial tension. Last week, she died at the ripe age of 98.

Dr. Height had spent a large part of her life to those people who had been denied equality. She was the only woman at the civil rights movement at its highest level. She was present at every march, at every milestone. Obama had made a statement following her death on April 20.

Height was, in fact, the voice for all of womankind in the civil rights movement and beyond. Now, leading women from all over the world, like poet Maya Angelou, singer BeBe Winans, educator Camille Cosby, as well as Denyce Graves, are expected to celebrate her life. In Washington, Height was a very powerful figure, and she had met with every President since Eisenhower. Her activism had gone on a long time, right from Obama’s election stretching backwards to the New Deal. Recently, she was seen cheering at events and instantly recognizable by her choice of colorful hats.

Height was born in 1912, in Richmond, VA, long before women were given the right to vote, and when black people didn’t have too many rights. She studied at New York University for her Bachelors and Masters degree. In the 1930s, she did social work, resolved riots in Harlem, and went on protest marches against the practice of lynching. Later, she became a leader in the Young Women’s Christian Association.

Two Human Rights lawyers hit by China with lifetime ban

China has hit two Human Rights lawyers with a lifetime ban – these lawyers represented a member of an outlawed spiritual movement. This lifetime ban is expected to prevent other lawyers from taking on human rights cases of a sensitive nature. The two lawyers, Tang Jitian and Liu Wei, said on the phone that the Beijing judicial authorities had told them on Friday that their credentials would be null void. This ruling is going to be permanent, but both lawyers intend to make an appeal before the court.

This ruling comes amidst widespread oppression on lawyers in China. In fact, authorities in China tend to come crashing down on anything which could remotely be seen as dissent – and the government is said to be increasingly worried about the assertiveness of the lawyers of the country. In fact, many lawyers have faced punishment for working with sensitive issues like the Falun Gong – the spiritual movement which has been banned as an evil cult by the communist government. This was done because apparently it would pose a serious threat to the authority of the state.

Tang said that some judicial authorities unfortunately were not only obstinate, but also conservative. He said that this ruling was probably a message to other lawyers to scare them.

Separate notices were uploaded by the Beijing Municipal Bureau of Justice, for Liu and Tang, announcing that they had lost their licenses. The notices stated that the lawyers had disobeyed court personnel, and not only that – had created chaos in the courtroom by disrupting the order, during the April 2009 trial in the Sichuan province, at the Luxhou Municipal Intermediate People’s Court.

The lawyers claim that during the trial, they were illegally videotaped, interrupted time after time by the judge, and then they walked out of the courtroom after objecting to being videotaped – this is illegal in Chinese courtrooms. Then the court became chaotic.

Way cleared by Spain for trial of super-judge

The Supreme Court of Spain has finally removed the last obstacle to putting on trial the judge who had indicted Augusto Pinochet and Osama bin Laden. Judge Baltasar Garzon had become famous all over the world for his cross-border justice cases, and he now faces charges of overstepping his jurisdiction by having launched a probe of the Spanish Civil War atrocities that were amnesty-covered. Luciano Varela was the Supreme Court judge who had indicted him last month, and he issued a ruling on Wednesday which rejected an appeal made by prosecutors on procedural grounds.
Garzon’s trial is being opposed by prosecutors. His indictment is the cause of a complaint that had been filed by two civil groups earlier, and then accepted by Varela. A judicial oversight board official said that the trial of Garzon would probably start in another couple of months, or maybe as late as September.
Last Tuesday, Garzon asked for a leave of absence, which he intended to use to take up a job offer at the International Criminal Court in The Hague. This would probably bring back some of his image after having been suspended from his post at the National Court, maybe with the commencement of the trial, or maybe even earlier.
This oversight board is called the General Council of the Judiciary, and it met on Wednesday to decide whether Garzon’s leave of absence should be granted. Meanwhile, Garzon was suspended, while waiting to transfer to The Hague – either that or he would have to give in a resignation from his post at the National Court to take up the new job. This was stated by the board official on the condition of anonymity, according to the rules of the board.